Hyderabad: As Telangana braces for a possible drought assessment later this month amid a strengthening El Niño, experts caution that the real distress facing farmers may not be visible in crop loss figures alone. A modest fall in production can translate into a devastating collapse in farm incomes, leaving cultivators struggling to repay debts, meet household expenses and fund the next cropping season.Agriculture expert GV Ramanjaneyulu, in an analysis of the 2026 drought situation, argues that policymakers often focus on crop losses measured in hectares or tonnes, while farmers experience drought through lost income. The distinction, he says, is critical because the financial impact of drought can far exceed the decline in agricultural output.The reason lies in the economics of cultivation. By the time a drought affects a standing crop, farmers have already incurred most of their expenses on seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, labour and irrigation. As a result, even a limited reduction in yield can wipe out a large share of their earnings.A simple illustration highlights the problem. If a farmer earns ₹100 from a crop after spending ₹70 on cultivation, the net income is ₹30. If drought reduces output and revenue by 20%, earnings fall to ₹80 while cultivation costs remain largely unchanged. The farmer is then left with just ₹10 as net income.In effect, a 20% crop loss can result in a 67% decline in cultivation income, exposing a gap between production statistics and the economic reality faced by farm households.Evidence of this phenomenon emerged in a study conducted in Nalgonda district and published in 2022 in the journal ‘Sustainability’. The study, titled ‘Assessing the Impact of Climate Resilient Technologies in Minimizing Drought Impacts on Farm Incomes in Drylands’, examined farm households in Nandyalagudem, Boringthanda and Kasarabad villages of Atmakur mandal during 2019-20.Researchers found that crop cultivation accounted for nearly 60% of household income, making it the single largest source of earnings for rural families. During drought conditions, income from crop cultivation declined by 54%, while income from livestock activities dropped by 40%. Agricultural employment also fell by 26%.The findings are particularly significant because they show that drought affects far more than agricultural output. In predominantly rainfed farming systems, where crops such as cotton, pigeon pea and paddy form the backbone of household earnings, even moderate production losses can sharply reduce disposable income.For many families, lower farm income means reduced spending on food, education and healthcare, besides making it harder to repay existing loans. It can also limit farmers’ ability to invest in the next crop, increasing their vulnerability in subsequent seasons.The study further found that villages adopting climate-resilient agricultural practices were better equipped to withstand drought. Farmers in the intervention village recorded incomes that were 35% higher than those in the control village during drought conditions.Researchers estimated that climate-resilient technologies generated an additional annual income of ₹31,877 per farm household, underlining the potential benefits of adaptation measures in drought-prone regions.“Seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, labour and irrigation costs are largely committed before the final yield is known. A hectare can therefore remain officially recorded as sown even after a subsequent dry spell has substantially reduced its productive potential,” agriculture economist Ravi Kanneganti said.The observation highlights a key limitation of conventional drought assessments. While acreage and production statistics may show only moderate losses, they often fail to capture the extent of income erosion suffered by farmers.Likewise, a farmer may eventually harvest a crop but still suffer significant financial distress if the market value of the produce is insufficient to recover cultivation costs. In such cases, official estimates of crop loss may understate true economic damage.
Source link
